Notice: Please update your API tools. Visit account options for required information. Buy our NEW shirt! Shipping is free on all orders! (LIMITED TIME!) Visit your account options to access your Patreon rewards! (Dismiss)
This post was deleted. Reason: Third-party watermark/Poor-quality edit / MD5: 9cd294f9d4d7e42fcf75690e92f4639f

Respond |

4 comments (0 hidden)
avatarGer14n5 >> #2219872
Posted on 2018-03-13 15:14:45 (Report as spam) Score: 1 (Vote Up)
During the video, I added a blur to the watermark to avoid a violation of the Terms of Service.

avatarAnonymous >> #2219882
Posted on 2018-03-13 15:53:26 (Report as spam) Score: 3 (Vote Up)
Urm, if I go to Japan... does anyone know the name of that bus stop?

avatarJerl >> #2219978
Posted on 2018-03-13 23:47:17 (Report as spam) Score: 1 (Vote Up)
What watermark? If the watermark was put there by the original publisher, you shouldn't blur it out - only third-party watermarks are disallowed. Burring it out is considered a poor-quality edit, which is grounds for the image to be deleted.

If the watermark was put there by someone other than the original publisher, blurring it out doesn't make it not a ToS violation. Not only is it still a watermark put there by someone other than the publisher (even if it can't be read anymore), but it's also still a poor-quality edit.

avatarjedi1357 >> #2219985
Posted on 2018-03-14 00:23:21 (Report as spam) Score: 0 (Vote Up)
I didn't even notice the blur until the video was 2/3s over.