Ger14n5>> #2219872 Posted on 2018-03-13 15:14:45 (Report as spam) Score: 1 (Vote Up) During the video, I added a blur to the watermark to avoid a violation of the Terms of Service.
Anonymous>> #2219882 Posted on 2018-03-13 15:53:26 (Report as spam) Score: 3 (Vote Up) Urm, if I go to Japan... does anyone know the name of that bus stop?
Jerl>> #2219978 Posted on 2018-03-13 23:47:17 (Report as spam) Score: 1 (Vote Up) What watermark? If the watermark was put there by the original publisher, you shouldn't blur it out - only third-party watermarks are disallowed. Burring it out is considered a poor-quality edit, which is grounds for the image to be deleted.
If the watermark was put there by someone other than the original publisher, blurring it out doesn't make it not a ToS violation. Not only is it still a watermark put there by someone other than the publisher (even if it can't be read anymore), but it's also still a poor-quality edit.
jedi1357>> #2219985 Posted on 2018-03-14 00:23:21 (Report as spam) Score: 0 (Vote Up) I didn't even notice the blur until the video was 2/3s over.